7.31.2012
OBAMA'S SECRET PLAN TO BAN GUNS
Click on the title headline for the full article
The chief of the powerful Gun Owners of America organization says there is no doubt Barack Obama will impose gun controls if he wins re-election, even without constitutional authority.
“I can see him telling gun stores, ‘You can’t sell a gun over .380. You can’t sell rifles [that use large magazines] or I’m pulling your license,” GOA Executive Director Larry Pratt told WND today.
“Even without legal authority, or constitutional authority. That hasn’t stopped him on so many other issues,” he said.
His comments come just as several factors are influencing the possibility of more gun restrictions:
*A U.N. small-arms treaty that critics said could violate the Constitution’s Second Amendment was just turned back as opposition mounted in the U.S. Senate;
*The aftermath of the mass shooting in the Aurora, Colo., theater;
*A comment by a conservative on the Supreme Court bench that some gun restrictions are possible judicially.
A report from the National Rifle Association said the Conference on the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty “has broken down and will not report a draft treaty to the member nations.”
Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., gathered the signatures of 51 senators on a letter to President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton “opposing any treaty that infringes on our rights,” the report said.
“The proponents of the treaty have goals that are clearly at odds with the American Constitution. Their refusal to remove civilian arms from the treaty was one major issue that led to the breakdown in negotiations. The U.S. delegation made it clear that they could not move forward with the language as it had been drafted,” the report said.
Pratt told WND that it was the voice of the American public to members of the U.S. Senate, who would have to approve the treaty, that slowed the issue’s momentum.
“If you lose 34, you don’t get a treaty,” he said. “The 51 [signatures] were very convincing evidence [of American opposition].”
“Once again we have disappointed the one-worlders who are not going to get gun control” he said.
Pratt also noted the surging American interest in owning guns – background checks for gun purchases were up 41 percent in Colorado the week after James Holmes, 24, a suspect in the theater shooting, allegedly used multiple weapons to kill 12 people and an unborn child and wound 58.
Then a report from USA Today quoted Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia saying that new gun restrictions could be upheld by the Supreme Court.
“It will have to be decided in future cases,” he said.
“Obviously, the amendment does not apply to arms that cannot be hand-carried. It’s to keep and bear. So, it doesn’t apply to cannons. But I suppose there are handheld rocket launchers than can bring down airplanes that will have to be [looked at]. … It will have to be decided,” he said.
The Aurora suspect, was charged today with 24 counts of first-degree murder.
Pratt said future access to many weapons in the United States will depend directly on the November election.
“If the president would be re-elected, I can see him going much more illegally and unconstitutionally to impose his will,” he said.
CLICK ON THE TITLE HEADLINE TO READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: If you think Obama has inflicted hell on our nation so far, just imagine what he would do if he didn't have to worry about re-election.
Liberal democrats have a distorted way of thinking when it comes to guns and gun laws. When something happens like the Aurora shooting, it's good citizens that carry guns that can intervene and stop guys like that. I'm a peace officer who carry's. If I were in that movie theatre I would have taken that guy out.
Liberals who constantly cry (stiff gun laws) need to understand that when you pass gun laws it does nothing to stop crazy people and criminals from having guns. All gun laws do are unarm the good citizens and leave them as sitting ducks.
But then again maybe that's what the liberals want. They don't want citizens to be able to defend themselves from nut-jobs or from a radical government.
I can see Obama issuing some absurd executive orders concerning guns if he gets another four years in office. And we already know that most courts will side with him right or wrong.
This election is for all the marbles guys. I suggest you get to the polls in November and take as many people as you can to vote for Romney. Everything is at stake. You have wicked groups like ACORN/ACLU etc out there grabbing fraudulent votes for Obama as we speak. We need a huge turn out at the polls to counter all that.
Click on image for larger view
A message from Mike Huckabee
Now that the Supreme Court has finally ruled on Obamacare, and let states opt out of the Medicaid expansion, the cost estimates of the program have just changed again. The Congressional Budget Office says there’s good news. Because of cuts to Medicare, all the new taxes and not having to reimburse states that don’t participate, the bill is now estimated to cost only $1.2 trillion over the first decade, or $84 billion less than previous estimates. By the way, only in Washington do accountants use the adjective “only” to describe “$1.2 trillion.”
But here’s the downside. When they say the “cost” is going down, they mean the cost to the federal government, not to anyone else. States that don’t expand Medicaid will still need to supply health care to about 3 million uninsured people. That cost will now come from the states, which still means the taxpayers. Also, those “new taxes” that lower the fed’s cost will add over $5 billion more than previously estimated to the costs of business owners and individuals. Again, it’s another cost to the taxpayers.
The one thing that never changes about Obamacare is that even after more than three years of projections, Republicans and Democrats are still having the same argument. Republicans say we don’t have a clue how much it will cost, and Democrats claim it will pay for itself. I’d say both sides are right, but only because whenever a politician says that a government program will “pay for itself,” what that means is that you’ll pay for it unless we do something.
Obama’s runaway spending train is going to demolish our economy unless we derail it this November. To do that we’ll need to regain the Senate, hold the House and elect Mitt Romney.
I’ve emailed you before about my commitment to fight for conservatives nationwide, today I ask that you endorse that commitment with a donation of $25 or more.
America has a chance to stop Obama from wrecking our economy, if and only if, we band together and elect strong conservatives. I firmly believe Huck PAC is the best way for you to get involved between now and Election Day, that’s why I hope you will endorse our efforts with a donation today.
Sincerely,
Mike Huckabee
But here’s the downside. When they say the “cost” is going down, they mean the cost to the federal government, not to anyone else. States that don’t expand Medicaid will still need to supply health care to about 3 million uninsured people. That cost will now come from the states, which still means the taxpayers. Also, those “new taxes” that lower the fed’s cost will add over $5 billion more than previously estimated to the costs of business owners and individuals. Again, it’s another cost to the taxpayers.
The one thing that never changes about Obamacare is that even after more than three years of projections, Republicans and Democrats are still having the same argument. Republicans say we don’t have a clue how much it will cost, and Democrats claim it will pay for itself. I’d say both sides are right, but only because whenever a politician says that a government program will “pay for itself,” what that means is that you’ll pay for it unless we do something.
Obama’s runaway spending train is going to demolish our economy unless we derail it this November. To do that we’ll need to regain the Senate, hold the House and elect Mitt Romney.
I’ve emailed you before about my commitment to fight for conservatives nationwide, today I ask that you endorse that commitment with a donation of $25 or more.
America has a chance to stop Obama from wrecking our economy, if and only if, we band together and elect strong conservatives. I firmly believe Huck PAC is the best way for you to get involved between now and Election Day, that’s why I hope you will endorse our efforts with a donation today.
Sincerely,
Mike Huckabee
7.26.2012
Liberty Counsel Warns School Board Not to Violate Pastor's Free Speech
Liberty Counsel has sent a letter to the Miami-Dade County School Superintendent stating that any effort to rescind a facilities usage lease to a church because of the pastor’s sermon on homosexuality would violate the First Amendment.
Miami-Dade County Public Schools is “reviewing” its lease to Impact Miami Church after Pastor Jack Hakimian preached the Biblical position on homosexuality. The school district superintendent maintains that the sermon allegedly violates the district’s antibullying and nondiscrimination policy. However, in the sermon in question, Pastor Hakimian explicitly denounces bullying and teaches to respect all people.
The nondiscrimination and antibullying policies of the Miami-Dade School Board are not applicable to the situation at hand. Pastor Hakimian and the church have violated no law or policy. The district cannot discriminate on the basis of his Biblically sound viewpoint.
Visit Liberty Counsel at www.LC.org
Miami-Dade County Public Schools is “reviewing” its lease to Impact Miami Church after Pastor Jack Hakimian preached the Biblical position on homosexuality. The school district superintendent maintains that the sermon allegedly violates the district’s antibullying and nondiscrimination policy. However, in the sermon in question, Pastor Hakimian explicitly denounces bullying and teaches to respect all people.
The nondiscrimination and antibullying policies of the Miami-Dade School Board are not applicable to the situation at hand. Pastor Hakimian and the church have violated no law or policy. The district cannot discriminate on the basis of his Biblically sound viewpoint.
Visit Liberty Counsel at www.LC.org
ROMNEY MOVES INTO LEAD AT GALLUP, RASMUSSEN...
Click here
Romney: It's Time For Leadership That Will Put Aside Partisanship And Focus On The Nation
BRIAN WILLIAMS: And when Mitt Romney arrives in Washington, how will Washington be any different from the Washington we've seen these past few years, which any American will tell you is hopelessly broken, busted?
(Lou Buren): It'll be different in that Romney will not spend trillions of dollars we don't have like Obama has. Romney will repeal the Obamacare social slavery act. Just to name a couple things that will be different.
MITT ROMNEY: You know, all I can say is that I got elected governor of a state that was 87% Democrat. And it was not lost on me that if I went around attacking the Democrat leadership, I was gonna get nothing done and none of my vetoes would be upheld. And I began a relationship with the speaker of the House and the Senate president that was personal. We respected each other. We often disagreed. But we found common ground from time to time.
That has to happen. There has to be a president that buries the hatchet and says, "We're gonna go to work to try and get America on track." We-- we're at a critical time in this country. If we keep going down the path we're on, we're gonna end up like Europe or worse. It's time to have leadership that will put aside Republican and par-- and-- and Democrat, and instead focus on what's necessary for the nation. I'm willing to do that. I think others in Washington have recognized the need to do that. I see hopeful signs we're gonna finally get America on track again.
CLICK HERE for article
'TRANSGENDER MARRIAGE' UP NEXT?
Click on the title headline for the full article
It's funny, I was just blogging about stuff like this in one of my earlier postings. About how accepting homosexuality opens the door to other perverse groups wanting acceptance of their sin as well.
I made the point that soon pedophiles would want acceptance. But now we have the Transgenders wanting to marry. Soon the people into Beastiality will want to marry animals. The pedophiles will want to marry kids. And as long as the blinded people out there all accept it. The courts and country leaders will deem it ok.
Family members of the sick minded will advocate their sin, and say well I have friends and family who were born that way. And they can love that horse, or that dog if they want to. And so on...
This article just makes my case all the more.
Supporters vow to keep cross in California veterans tribute despite court ruling
Supporters vow to keep cross at a Korean War tribute in California despite court ruling it is unconstitutional.
For decades, there has been a First Amendment battle raging over the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial in La Jolla, Calif., where a large cross anchors a tribute to Korean War veterans.
Because it sits on public property, the American Civil Liberties Union has long argued that the cross amounts to an unconstitutional entanglement of government and religion.
In 2011, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, triggering an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, but in June, the high court justices declined to hear the case.
Oddly, the 9th Circuit, while ruling the cross illegal, didn't order it removed. The parties were left to begin negotiations about what to do with it. "We're going to go back and talk to the district court and talk to the government, and we will work at arriving at an appropriate remedy," ACLU attorney David Loy said at the time.
But just days ago, attorneys for the Mount Soledad Memorial Association learned that the ACLU has been negotiating with the Department of Justice without including the group that actually maintains the cross and memorial site. That sparked concern on Capitol Hill.
Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., a veteran himself, notes that there is a federal law in place protecting the memorial. Hunter worries that rather than fighting to uphold the law, the Justice Department may be negotiating away the protections outlined in the law.
"If the DOJ is not going to enforce congressional law, they're going to go off on their own in what appears to be lockstep with the ACLU. That puts the cross in danger," he said.
Hunter, along with fellow California Republican Rep. Brian Bilbray, sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder requesting more information about the negotiations and demanding that the Memorial Association be included in future talks. The lawmakers also requested an immediate meeting with Justice officials, but Hunter says that was refused.
On Thursday, a federal judge is scheduled to hold a hearing involving the parties, and now it appears that hearing will be focused on the issue of negotiations and which organizations must be included in talks about what to do with the cross.
Attorneys for the Memorial Association say they will take the opportunity to lodge serious objections to the “secret negotiations” between the ACLU and Justice Department and will not agree to any resolution that involves taking the cross down from its current spot.
Click on the title headline for the full article
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: What D. Hunter might want to remember is that Eric Holder, The DOJ and pretty much all liberals are in Obama's back pocket. They will almost always side with the wicked. And The ACLU are one of the most wicked organizations around.
For decades, there has been a First Amendment battle raging over the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial in La Jolla, Calif., where a large cross anchors a tribute to Korean War veterans.
Because it sits on public property, the American Civil Liberties Union has long argued that the cross amounts to an unconstitutional entanglement of government and religion.
In 2011, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, triggering an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, but in June, the high court justices declined to hear the case.
Oddly, the 9th Circuit, while ruling the cross illegal, didn't order it removed. The parties were left to begin negotiations about what to do with it. "We're going to go back and talk to the district court and talk to the government, and we will work at arriving at an appropriate remedy," ACLU attorney David Loy said at the time.
But just days ago, attorneys for the Mount Soledad Memorial Association learned that the ACLU has been negotiating with the Department of Justice without including the group that actually maintains the cross and memorial site. That sparked concern on Capitol Hill.
Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., a veteran himself, notes that there is a federal law in place protecting the memorial. Hunter worries that rather than fighting to uphold the law, the Justice Department may be negotiating away the protections outlined in the law.
"If the DOJ is not going to enforce congressional law, they're going to go off on their own in what appears to be lockstep with the ACLU. That puts the cross in danger," he said.
Hunter, along with fellow California Republican Rep. Brian Bilbray, sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder requesting more information about the negotiations and demanding that the Memorial Association be included in future talks. The lawmakers also requested an immediate meeting with Justice officials, but Hunter says that was refused.
On Thursday, a federal judge is scheduled to hold a hearing involving the parties, and now it appears that hearing will be focused on the issue of negotiations and which organizations must be included in talks about what to do with the cross.
Attorneys for the Memorial Association say they will take the opportunity to lodge serious objections to the “secret negotiations” between the ACLU and Justice Department and will not agree to any resolution that involves taking the cross down from its current spot.
Click on the title headline for the full article
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: What D. Hunter might want to remember is that Eric Holder, The DOJ and pretty much all liberals are in Obama's back pocket. They will almost always side with the wicked. And The ACLU are one of the most wicked organizations around.
7.25.2012
Question on homosexuality answered
Someone sent me an Email asking me to answer this question publicly. Is homosexuality and pedophilia affiliated in any way?
Well, let me first say this: I realise that many people have friends and family that live homosexual lives. And that is unfortunate. With that said, homosexuality has been around for quite sometime. It's even addressed in The Bible. Years ago, it was listed in medical education books as a mental illness. I personally see it as a spiritual illness brought on by pain, rejection, and confusion.
For a time it was looked down on, and those who indulged in the sin kept it very secret. Sadly, the wicked activity is now advocated by liberals and other lost people. The Bible tells us that in the end days that wickedness will grow increasingly. So the way things are going with the homosexual agenda proves the Bible true. Unless America wakes up and takes a stand on the issues, we can expect worse to come.
Homosexuality is an activity, not an identity. For one to come to grips with the truth they must first understand that. The Bible is clear in it's teachings that people who live homosexual lives will not inherit the Kingdom of God. So, if people have friends and family who live such a life and they love them. They would try and try to get them to repent of this sinful lifestyle.
I would rather take of chance of them being angry at me, then to stand idle while they travel down a path to hell. People's opinion on marriage and sex do not matter. Gods opinion and laws are everything. He owns us and set rules for us to live by. And like it or not, one day we will all stand before him and give an account to him for all things said and done.
Now, back to my answer to the above question: Yes, homosexuality and pedophilia are affiliated.
They are both sinful acts. And they both involve perverse abominable acts of sex. God only allows sex between one married man and one married woman. All other sex is sin.
You hear homosexuals saying they want equality and equal rights. They claim to have been born the way they are. Well, I tell you they are lying. What if pedophiles starting claiming they were born the way they are and that they want equal rights? What would you say to that?
It's the exact same thing. When people indulge in sexual sins like homosexuality it's a choice. they only claim to be born that way to counter opposition to their sinful ways.
As a Christian I do not hate people who live homosexual lives. I pray for their salvation. Because I'm concerned for them. Hate is not a Christian value. But neither is accepting sin to make the sinful happy or to feel better about their sin.
Well, let me first say this: I realise that many people have friends and family that live homosexual lives. And that is unfortunate. With that said, homosexuality has been around for quite sometime. It's even addressed in The Bible. Years ago, it was listed in medical education books as a mental illness. I personally see it as a spiritual illness brought on by pain, rejection, and confusion.
For a time it was looked down on, and those who indulged in the sin kept it very secret. Sadly, the wicked activity is now advocated by liberals and other lost people. The Bible tells us that in the end days that wickedness will grow increasingly. So the way things are going with the homosexual agenda proves the Bible true. Unless America wakes up and takes a stand on the issues, we can expect worse to come.
Homosexuality is an activity, not an identity. For one to come to grips with the truth they must first understand that. The Bible is clear in it's teachings that people who live homosexual lives will not inherit the Kingdom of God. So, if people have friends and family who live such a life and they love them. They would try and try to get them to repent of this sinful lifestyle.
I would rather take of chance of them being angry at me, then to stand idle while they travel down a path to hell. People's opinion on marriage and sex do not matter. Gods opinion and laws are everything. He owns us and set rules for us to live by. And like it or not, one day we will all stand before him and give an account to him for all things said and done.
Now, back to my answer to the above question: Yes, homosexuality and pedophilia are affiliated.
They are both sinful acts. And they both involve perverse abominable acts of sex. God only allows sex between one married man and one married woman. All other sex is sin.
You hear homosexuals saying they want equality and equal rights. They claim to have been born the way they are. Well, I tell you they are lying. What if pedophiles starting claiming they were born the way they are and that they want equal rights? What would you say to that?
It's the exact same thing. When people indulge in sexual sins like homosexuality it's a choice. they only claim to be born that way to counter opposition to their sinful ways.
As a Christian I do not hate people who live homosexual lives. I pray for their salvation. Because I'm concerned for them. Hate is not a Christian value. But neither is accepting sin to make the sinful happy or to feel better about their sin.
7.18.2012
Sheriff Joe's posse goes after Obama
The Arizona official claims he has proof that the president's birth certificate is a fake.
PHOENIX (AP) — Investigators for an Arizona sheriff's volunteer posse say President Barack Obama's birth certificate is definitely fraudulent.
Members of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's posse said in March that there was probable cause that Obama's long-form birth certificate released by the White House in April 2011 was a computer-generated forgery.
Now, Arpaio says investigators are positive it's fraudulent.
So-called "birthers" maintain Obama is ineligible to be president because, they contend, he was born in Kenya. However, Hawaii officials have repeatedly verified Obama's citizenship, and courts have rebuffed lawsuits over the issue.
Mike Zullo, the Arizona posse's chief investigator, said numeric codes on parts of the long-form birth certificate indicate those parts weren't filled out, yet those sections asking for the race of Obama's father and his field of work or study were completed.
Zullo said investigators previously didn't know the meaning of the codes but they were explained by a 95-year-old former state worker who signed the president's birth certificate. Zullo said a writer who published a book about Obama's birth certificate and was aiding investigators let them listen to an interview he conducted with the former state worker.
The Arizona Democratic Party said in a statement that Arpaio's investigation is intended to draw attention away from problems within his own agency, such as hundreds of sex-crime cases that the sheriff's office failed to adequately investigate over a three-year period.
A civil trial is set to begin Thursday in a lawsuit that accuses Arpaio's office of racially profiling Latinos. The suit filed by a handful of Latinos will serve as a precursor to the U.S. Justice Department's lawsuit that alleges a broader range of civil rights violations against Arpaio's office.
Obama released a copy of his long-form birth certificate in an attempt to quell citizenship questions. His campaign declined to comment on Arpaio's allegations.
But Joshua A. Wisch, a special assistant to Hawaii's attorney general, said his state's vital records are some of the best-managed and have "some of the strongest restrictions on access to prevent identity theft and fraud."
"President Obama was born in Honolulu, and his birth certificate is valid," Wisch said in a statement. "Regarding the latest allegations from a sheriff in Arizona, they are untrue, misinformed, and misconstrue Hawaii law."
Click on the title headline for the article which features a video.
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: There is obviously a massive cover up on the truth about Obama. Thank you Sheriff Joe for bringing the truth out.
Elderly Man Foils Robbery, Shoots Suspects
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: This guy makes me very proud. He showed one of the reasons we must always cherish and defend our second amendment rights. Because if we allow the liberals to ban guns, the criminals will be the only ones carrying them. If all citizens legally carried concealed weapons, the crime rate would virtually vanish. Because the thugs, parolees, and gang members fear people who can shoot back. They are cowards and prey on the unarmed. Only vote for people who actually vote to support the second amendment. Many candidates claim to, but their voting record says otherwise. Check their voting records before you vote.
Click on the title headline for the full article
A 71-year-old Florida man is being hailed as a hero after he pulled out a gun and shot two men as they tried to rob an Internet cafe in Ocala. The foiled robbery attempt was captured on surveillance video.
The Florida State Attorney’s Office told The Gainesville Sun that it is unlikely Samuel Williams will be charged.
“Based on what I have seen and what I know at this time, I don’t anticipate filing any charges,” said Bill Gladson of the State Attorney’s Office for 5th Judicial Circuit.
Gladson told the newspaper that it appears the shooting was justified and the senior adult had a concealed weaposn permit.
Mary Beach was one of several dozen people inside the cafe when the attempted robbery happened.
“I think he is wonderful,” she told the newspaper. “If he wouldn’t have been there, there could have been some innocent people shot.”
The surveillance video shows two masked men entering the Palms Internet Cafe. One of the suspects had a gun — the other had a baseball bat.
Watch the video to see Mr. Williams invoke his Second Amendment Rights.
Click on the title headline for the full article
A 71-year-old Florida man is being hailed as a hero after he pulled out a gun and shot two men as they tried to rob an Internet cafe in Ocala. The foiled robbery attempt was captured on surveillance video.
The Florida State Attorney’s Office told The Gainesville Sun that it is unlikely Samuel Williams will be charged.
“Based on what I have seen and what I know at this time, I don’t anticipate filing any charges,” said Bill Gladson of the State Attorney’s Office for 5th Judicial Circuit.
Gladson told the newspaper that it appears the shooting was justified and the senior adult had a concealed weaposn permit.
Mary Beach was one of several dozen people inside the cafe when the attempted robbery happened.
“I think he is wonderful,” she told the newspaper. “If he wouldn’t have been there, there could have been some innocent people shot.”
The surveillance video shows two masked men entering the Palms Internet Cafe. One of the suspects had a gun — the other had a baseball bat.
Watch the video to see Mr. Williams invoke his Second Amendment Rights.
7.17.2012
ARE RACE RIOTS NOT NEWS?
When I first saw a book with the title, “White Girl Bleed A Lot” by Colin Flaherty, I instantly knew what it was about, even though I had not seen the book reviewed anywhere, and knew nothing about the author.
That is because I had encountered that phrase before, while doing research for the four new chapters on intellectuals and race that I added to the revised edition of my own book, “Intellectuals and Society,” published this year.
That phrase was spoken by a member of a mob of young blacks who attacked whites at random at a Fourth of July celebration in Milwaukee last year. What I was appalled to learn, in the course of my research, was that such race riots have occurred in other cities across the United States in recent years – and that the national mainstream media usually ignore these riots.
Where the violence is too widespread and too widely known locally to be ignored, both the local media and public officials often describe what happened as unspecified “young people” attacking unspecified victims for unspecified reasons. But videos of the attacks often reveal both the racial nature of these attacks and the racial hostility expressed by the attackers.
Are race riots not news?
Ignoring racial violence only guarantees that it will get worse. The Chicago Tribune has publicly rationalized its filtering out of any racial identification of attackers and their victims, even though the media do not hesitate to mention race when decrying statistical disparities in arrest or imprisonment rates.
Such mob attacks have become so frequent in Chicago that officials promoting conventions there have recently complained to the mayor that the city is going to lose business if such widespread violence is not brought under control.
But neither these officials nor the mayor nor most of the media use that four-letter word, “race.” It would not be politically correct or politically convenient in an election year.
Reading Colin Flaherty’s book made painfully clear to me that the magnitude of this problem is even greater than I had discovered from my own research. He documents both the race riots and the media and political evasions in dozens of cities across America.
Flaherty’s previous writings have won him praise and awards, but this book has been met largely with silence or abuse. However much ignoring the ugly realities his book reveal may serve the interests of the media or politicians, a cover-up is a huge disservice to everyone else – whether black, white or whatever.
Even the young hoodlums who launch these mass attacks on strangers would be better off to be stopped now, rather than continue on a path of escalating violence that can lead to a lifetime behind bars or to the execution chamber.
The dangers to the nation as a whole are an even bigger problem. The truth has a way of eventually coming out, in spite of media silence and politicians’ spin. If the truth becomes widely known, and a white backlash follows, turning one-way race riots into two-way race riots, then a cycle of revenge and counter-revenge can spiral out of control, as has already happened in too many other countries around the world.
Most blacks and most whites in the United States today get along with each other. But what is chilling is how often in history racial or ethnic groups that co-existed peacefully for generations – often as neighbors – have suddenly turned on each other with lethal violence.
In the middle of the 20th century, Sri Lanka had a level of mutual respect and even friendship between its majority and minority communities that was rightly held up to the world as a model. Yet this situation degenerated over the years into polarization and violence that escalated into a civil war that lasted for decades, with unspeakable atrocities on both sides.
All it took were clever demagogues and gullible followers. We already have both. What it will take to nip in the bud the small but widely spreading race riots will be some serious leadership in many quarters and that rarest of all things in politics, honesty.
Race hustlers and mob inciters like Al Sharpton represent such polarizing forces in America today. Yet Sharpton has become a White House adviser, and Attorney General Eric Holder has been photographed literally embracing him.
Click the title headline for the full article
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: The blacks in America keep themselves deemed the bottom of the barrel people group. Not because of their skin colour, but because of their low life actions. The way they act is why the majority of prison populations consist of blacks.
Hopefully one day they'll figure out how to act mature and sane.
I wouldn't hold your breathe though.
That is because I had encountered that phrase before, while doing research for the four new chapters on intellectuals and race that I added to the revised edition of my own book, “Intellectuals and Society,” published this year.
That phrase was spoken by a member of a mob of young blacks who attacked whites at random at a Fourth of July celebration in Milwaukee last year. What I was appalled to learn, in the course of my research, was that such race riots have occurred in other cities across the United States in recent years – and that the national mainstream media usually ignore these riots.
Where the violence is too widespread and too widely known locally to be ignored, both the local media and public officials often describe what happened as unspecified “young people” attacking unspecified victims for unspecified reasons. But videos of the attacks often reveal both the racial nature of these attacks and the racial hostility expressed by the attackers.
Are race riots not news?
Ignoring racial violence only guarantees that it will get worse. The Chicago Tribune has publicly rationalized its filtering out of any racial identification of attackers and their victims, even though the media do not hesitate to mention race when decrying statistical disparities in arrest or imprisonment rates.
Such mob attacks have become so frequent in Chicago that officials promoting conventions there have recently complained to the mayor that the city is going to lose business if such widespread violence is not brought under control.
But neither these officials nor the mayor nor most of the media use that four-letter word, “race.” It would not be politically correct or politically convenient in an election year.
Reading Colin Flaherty’s book made painfully clear to me that the magnitude of this problem is even greater than I had discovered from my own research. He documents both the race riots and the media and political evasions in dozens of cities across America.
Flaherty’s previous writings have won him praise and awards, but this book has been met largely with silence or abuse. However much ignoring the ugly realities his book reveal may serve the interests of the media or politicians, a cover-up is a huge disservice to everyone else – whether black, white or whatever.
Even the young hoodlums who launch these mass attacks on strangers would be better off to be stopped now, rather than continue on a path of escalating violence that can lead to a lifetime behind bars or to the execution chamber.
The dangers to the nation as a whole are an even bigger problem. The truth has a way of eventually coming out, in spite of media silence and politicians’ spin. If the truth becomes widely known, and a white backlash follows, turning one-way race riots into two-way race riots, then a cycle of revenge and counter-revenge can spiral out of control, as has already happened in too many other countries around the world.
Most blacks and most whites in the United States today get along with each other. But what is chilling is how often in history racial or ethnic groups that co-existed peacefully for generations – often as neighbors – have suddenly turned on each other with lethal violence.
In the middle of the 20th century, Sri Lanka had a level of mutual respect and even friendship between its majority and minority communities that was rightly held up to the world as a model. Yet this situation degenerated over the years into polarization and violence that escalated into a civil war that lasted for decades, with unspeakable atrocities on both sides.
All it took were clever demagogues and gullible followers. We already have both. What it will take to nip in the bud the small but widely spreading race riots will be some serious leadership in many quarters and that rarest of all things in politics, honesty.
Race hustlers and mob inciters like Al Sharpton represent such polarizing forces in America today. Yet Sharpton has become a White House adviser, and Attorney General Eric Holder has been photographed literally embracing him.
Click the title headline for the full article
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: The blacks in America keep themselves deemed the bottom of the barrel people group. Not because of their skin colour, but because of their low life actions. The way they act is why the majority of prison populations consist of blacks.
Hopefully one day they'll figure out how to act mature and sane.
I wouldn't hold your breathe though.
7.16.2012
Latest news (Top stories)
Click the title link for article
SHERIFF JOE RESPONDS TO SMUTTY COMIC
PHOENIX, Ariz. – In response to a vicious verbal assault by comic George Lopez on Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Mitt Romney during a live HBO special, Arpaio has issued a challenge he doubts Lopez will accept.
After joking Romney was a closeted Latino because his father was born in Mexico, Lopez ripped into Arpaio with a string of obscenities and insults.
And while we’re at it Sheriff Joe in Arizona – f— you you f—ing puto. How about that? F— you. You fat motherf—er. F— you. I said I was going to talk some s—. F— you Sheriff Joe you f—ing puto. F— you. F— you.
Click on the title headline for the full article
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: Wow, really George?! really?! For a supposed comedian your not very funny. He should be ashamed of himself and embarrassed at his own comments. That's not how mature educated people act or speak. But then again, whoever said he was mature or educated?
The fact of the matter is Joe is America's top cop. And continues to do a hell of a job securing our borders. A job that the FEDS should be doing but fail to do. We here at TWAU BLOG commend Joe on a job well done.
50 CHRISTIANS BURNED TO DEATH IN PASTOR'S HOME
Fifty members of a northern Nigerian church were burned to death in their pastor’s house.
The attack by armed gunmen was only the first in a 12-village spree of violence that left over 100 dead in northern Nigeria’s Plateau State, a region that had previously been outside Islamic terrorist group Boko Haram’s operational area and is the homeland of the largely Muslim Fulani tribesmen.
Yet Boko Haram claimed responsibility for the attacks and threatened even more violence.
Open Doors, USA spokesman Jerry Dykstra says this most recent wave of attacks is quickly turning all of Nigeria into deadly religious battlefield, where Boko Haram is declaring Christians must covert … or die.
“Nigeria is truly becoming the new killing field for Christians. Hundreds of Christians have already been brutally murdered – including women and children – by the Boko Haram,” Dykstra said. “The Boko Haram earlier this week said that all Christians need to turn to Islam or ‘they would never know peace again.’ Their goal is make all of Nigeria a country run and dominated by Shariah law.”
Click Here for the full article
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: I believe that Islam will be affiliated with the antichrist when he emerges. So it no doubt will keep growing and become even more dominant in the world. It's wicked components even making their way into United States court systems. It truly is a false religion of hate and murder. A doctrine of demons.
If America wants to heal and get back on track, it must ban Islam altogether. It's the only answer. It is evil.
4th of July image/click for larger view
7.15.2012
Obama to business owners: 'You didn't build that'
Click on the title headline for article
Retard Obama, in a speech to supporters, suggested business owners owe their success to government investment in infrastructure and other projects -- saying “if you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that.”
Obama’s comment Friday during a campaign stop in Roanoke, Va., came just days after he urged Congress to extend tax cuts enacted during the Bush administration only to families earning less than $250,000 annually -- part of his argument that top earners have an obligation to pay more to trim the deficit.
“There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me because they want to give something back,” the president said. “If you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something -- there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.
“If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen,” he said. “The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.”
CLICK THE TITLE HEADLINE FOR THE FULL ARTICLE
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: Obama never ceases to amaze me. He's one of those guys who can make total non-sense sound like something. His statements couldn't be more incorrect. If you start a business you did indeed build that. You started it, and you will make it work. And in most cases those who become wealthy did it because they were a whole lot smarter that others.
They were certainly smarter that the moron who is in and out of prison all their life. The business owner was certainly smarter that the guy who chooses to work at 7-11 his whole life. I'de say they were probably smarter than the people who live on food stamps and government hand outs.
And without a doubt smarter than those who voted for Obama. Obama has this flawed way of thinking, in that nations should be viewed like people are viewed. He wants our nation to be equal with all other nations, which is why it's very obvious that he supports a one world government.
But America is special, we are better than all other nations. Equal with maybe only Israel. But the USA is a sovereign nation over all other countries. And that is because we are Gods country.
And whether or not Obama likes it, The united states is just a Christian nation.
7.12.2012
‘Fed Up’ with Linda with Linda Bollea’s Lying
Hulk Hogan has had it with his ex-wife, Linda Bollea, and her “non-stop lying” … and that’s why he’s finally decided to sue her.
We spotted Hulk and his new wife at LAX yesterday, the day after he filed a defamation lawsuit against Linda. In her book, she claims Hulk abused her for years and had a homosexual affair with legendary wrestler Brutus “The Barber” Beefcake.
From the way Hulk went off in this video, sounds like Hulkamania is ready to run wild … in court.
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: That's good to hear, Linda has used and abused poor Hulk. now it's his turn to stand up for himself and spank her ass in court. I hope he takes her for everything she took from him plus more.
Hulk Hogan has always been a stand up guy, a good father and a loving husband to this ungrateful tramp. I say good for you Hulk! Take her to the cleaners!
7.11.2012
JON VOIGHT DEFENDS BRAD PITT'S MOM
Click on the title headline for the full article
The battle over Brad Pitt’s mother and her comments slamming Barack Obama while supporting Mitt Romney is collecting another member of the Brangelina clan: actor Jon Voight.
Voight, known for his roles in “Midnight Cowboy,” “Deliverance,” “National Treasure” and TV’s “24,” is the father of actress Angelina Jolie, who is married to actor Brad Pitt.
As WND reported this week, Jane Pitt, mother of actor Brad Pitt, has been scared into silence by the hate-filled, vulgar and even violent reaction to her public assertion that Barack Obama is “a liberal who supports the killing of unborn babies and same-sex marriage.”
Pitt has even been the subject of death threats following her letter to the editor of Missouri’s Springfield News-Leader in which she asserted failure to vote for Republican presumptive presidential candidate Mitt Romney constituted a vote for Obama.
“All hell has descended on this woman,” said radio host Rush Limbaugh this afternoon.
WND spoke briefly with Pitt and asked about the media assault against her for her comments as a private citizen supporting Romney. With inflections in her voice that conveyed fear and despair, she quietly and politely said she was not interested in talking to anyone in the media about the incident.
When she was told WND supported her right to speak her mind and is appalled by the threats against her life, Pitt expressed gratitude to WND for being one of the few news agencies doing so. Even her thank you, however, was said in a subdued manner laden with heaviness of heart.
Now, Fox News is reporting Mrs. Pitt has at least one high-profile supporter on her daughter-in-law’s side of the family: Jolie’s father, Jon Voight.
“Good for her,” Voight told FOX411′s Pop Tarts column, adding he agrees with the points-of-view expressed by Jane.
A representative for Obama supporter Brad Pitt did not respond for further comment.
Jane Pitt also received some family support from her son Doug this week on NBC’s “Today.”
“I think moms and dads and kids agree to disagree all over the world. So why would our family be any different? There can be healthy discussion when people disagree with you,” he said. “The bad thing is when it turns to venom and negativity, and we don’t have that in our family. It’s open discussion. We can learn from each other and, if anything, it solidifies your point. Or maybe you learn something.”
The media firestorm has given Mrs. Pitt every reason to be frightened. Following her letter to the editor in her local newspaper, mainstream news agencies have painted her comments in a vilifying light.
The Hollywood Reporter published a story headlined, “Brad Pitt’s mother pens anti-gay, anti-Obama letter to local newspaper.” The New York Daily News went further, penning an article originally titled, “Brad Pitt’s mom unleashes anti-gay, anti-Obama fury in letter.”
She Knows Entertainment reported that Pitt actually “hates Obama, ‘gay’ people.”
These slants on the story, however, are mild compared to comments posted on Twitter.
Editors of the Twitter-scouring news site Twitchy exclaimed sarcastically, “Time for the left’s self-proclaimed arbiters of tolerance to teach her a lesson with their hateful, misogynist slurs and death wishes.”
Twitchy then spotlighted some of the tweets it found.
“Brad Pitt’s mom, die,” wrote Twitter-poster Sandy Kownacka.
A tweet from “I Bleed Gaga” echoed similar sentiments, saying, “Brad Pitt’s mom wrote an anti-gay pro-Romney editorial. Kill the b—-.”
Other comments included, “F— you, brad pitt’s mom, the gay community made your kid a star, you whacko,” and, “Brad Pitt’s mom is a dumb c—.”
Many of the comments told her to commit vulgar sexual acts with the commenter.
These statements stand contrary to Pitt’s own statements about his mother. In January, Pitt told the Hollywood Reporter that his mother was a very loving person.
“She’s very, very loving – very open, genuine, and it’s hilarious because she always gets painted in the tabloids as a she-devil,” the actor said. “There’s not an ounce of malice in her. She wants everyone to be happy.”
You can continue to read the article in FULL by clicking on the title headline above
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: This poor woman speaks her opinion and the so called tolerant crowd threaten and verbally abuse her? So, much for tolerance eh? I guess they meant only be tolerant of gays. It doesn't mean they have to be tolerant of normal people's views. Notice they only pick on the meek. No one threatens me. No one tries to bully me.
These types of sick minded people are in for a rude awakening come November when their king is overthrown. 2012 is Romney time! And the time to boot Obama's arse to the curb.
Click on the image for larger view
7.04.2012
Newest 'cannibal': Karl Laventure
Click on the title headline for article
A 'zombie cannibal' was tasered by police after he charged at them wielding a golf club.
Karl Laventure, 21, was believed to be high on bath salts when he tried to attack the officers in Lilburn, Georgia.
And after they had managed to subdue him he began threatening to eat them.
Laventure appeared out of some woods and was seen running naked around a golf range near Atlanta, swinging a club around his head and screaming.
Police said that it took several officers to subdue the man who had 'super-human strength'.
You can click the title headline for the full article
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: Something very strange is happening. This is like the 3rd zombie story I have heard recently. Drugs have been out there for a long time, but this new epidemic of cannibalism just started. There is either some type of new drug that is destroying peoples minds or this could be a result of the government testing things on people. Either way, it's scary stuff.
When people play with drugs or things that mess with your brain chemistry, it opens the mind up to demonic activity.
7.02.2012
SHERIFF JOE SET TO RELEASE MORE OBAMA 'SHOCKERS'
CLICK THE TITLE HEADLINE FOR MORE...
Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse investigating Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility have been promising more major revelations since their March 1 press conference, and now another event has been scheduled to unveil new information.
Arpaio told WND a press conference will be held July 17 at 2:30 p.m. local time at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office in Phoenix, Ariz.
WND will once again provide live Web streaming of the event.
The evidence will include information gathered in the posse’s recent investigative trip to Hawaii as well as an update on the ongoing investigation.
At the March 1 conference, as WND reported March 1, Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse announced there is probable cause that the document released by the White House in April 2011 purporting to be Obama’s original, long-form birth certificate is a forgery. The posse said it also found probable cause that Obama’s Selective Service registration form is fraudulent.
WND reported last month that a letter from Hawaii’s Department of Health verifying Obama’s birth in Honolulu has “opened the door” to some “shocking revelations” the posse is promising to disclose.
Among the details leaked early by Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo: There are allegedly several stamps bearing Registrar Alvin Onaka’s name “floating around” inside the Hawaii Department of Health.
“I can’t disclose to you what we’ve discovered, but it’s going to be a shocking revelation at our press conference,” Zullo told Tea Party Power Hour host Mark Gillar in a telephone interview from Hawaii.
Three weeks after the March 1 press conference, Arpaio said there was “tons” more potentially shocking information on Obama in connection with his probe into the president’s eligibility.
Zullo has said he and his investigators have reservations about a letter stamped with Onaka’s name that was sent to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett as verification of Obama’s Hawaiian birth.
Zulllo said the letter fails to list Obama’s birth date, and it’s merely stamped with the registrar’s name, while another set of initials – not Onaka’s – appears next to the signature.
“From what you’re telling me,” Gillar said, “it sounds like the next press conference is going to be even more amazing than the last press conference back on March 1st.”
“It will be,” Zullo responded. “The information … is going to be breathtaking when it’s released.”
Click the title headline for the full article
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: It's only a matter of time before Joe's team has enough info to prosecute Obama. I urge all of our readers to donate to Joe's posse if you can. It really is a good cause. You can find the link on WND's article (linked at the title headline)
My prediction still stands, I believe Obama will lose the November election by a huge margin.
Romney will win the election. Mark my words. If for no other reason, because so many Americans liberal and conservative want Obamacare repealed.
I think the American people will cast their vote to remove democrats from all power this year. I predict a GOP dominate senate and white house. And boy do we need that ASAP!
BLACK MOBS NOW BEATING JEWS IN NEW YORK
Click on the title headline for the article
If Chaim Amalek had his way, no one would know that mobs of black people are attacking and beating and robbing Jews in the New York area.
Or that they shout anti-Semitic epithets.
Or that they target Jews because “they don’t fight back.”
“Such information can only serve to heighten racial tensions between these two groups,” said Amalek, an alias for New York video blogger Luke Ford. “Let us all look beyond the issue of race (in any event a mere social construct) and instead celebrate our diversity.”
In this case, the New York Post saw a pattern that most other media outlets never see. To some, it was jarring.
“Anti-Jewish crime wave,” read the June headline about a series of recent anti-Semitic attacks. “In the most disturbing incident, a mob of six black teenagers shouting, ‘Dirty Jew!’ and ‘Dirty kike!’ repeatedly bashed Marc Heinberg, 61, as he walked home from temple in Sheepshead Bay (in June.)”
This is one of several black mob attacks on – and robberies of – Jewish people in Brooklyn over the last two years, leaving broken bones and life-threatening injuries in their wake.
The assaults are part of a larger pattern in the New York area and around the country: Black mobs assaulting, robbing, destroying property and creating mayhem – hundreds of times in more than 60 cities.
Orthodox Jews may bear a disproportionate amount of the violence in New York. But the lawlessness that black mobs inflict throughout the area is not limited to Jews. Much of it is on YouTube.
In February, four black people beat and robbed an Orthodox Jew in the New York suburb of Monsey. They were charged with hate crimes after it was determined they targeted the victim based on his religion. News accounts do not mention the race of the attackers, but the picture tells the story.
In a three-week period after Thanksgiving 2010, the same group of black people was charged in three separate episodes of targeting, beating and robbing members of the Orthodox community. One of the victims, Joel Weinberger, spent four days in the hospital with broken bones and required 10 hours of surgery on his broken jaw and eye socket.
Ford and others, such as MSNBC news anchor Melissa Harris-Perry, say the media should not report news if it makes black people look bad. But most racial crimes and violence from black mobs in the New York area are usually not reported – not by the mainstream media anyway.
Witnesses and others who know often find a way to drop a dime, or a video or Internet posting.
Just a few days before the Heinberg beating, a group of students from a predominately black school in a predominantly black neighborhood in Brooklyn were “evicted” from the 9/11 Memorial site in Manhattan “after they callously hurled trash into its fountains. The vile vandals from Junior High School 292 in East New York treated the solemn memorial – its reflecting pools honoring the nearly 3,000 people killed in the terror attacks – like a garbage dump.”
One of the students was found carrying ammunition.
The story did not identify the race of the students. The picture for the article featured a young white person looking over the fountains. But people who posted comments to the story, many of whom said they lived near the school, identified the vandals as black – if only to defend them.
“The NYPD have destroyed enough young black lives,” wrote poster Blaque Knyte. “I’d be willing to bet you didn’t suggest jail for the little white suburban thugs who harassed that elderly bus matron to tears, which IS a crime by the way.”
Many of the commenters said the story should have identified the race of the miscreants – if only to protect the community from future mayhem. That was too much for “brooklynborn,” who said, “I am embarrassed for my fellow Americans who flaunt their racism so publicly. What they did was offensive, but the conditions of where we grew up – compared to the wealth of Wall St. – is also offensive.”
While New Yorkers continue to debate whether race has anything to do with crime, or whether it should be reported, the list of racially violent and lawless episodes continues to grow.
On May 12, black women taunted two teenage girls on a subway before “hauling” the girls off the subway, beating them and stealing one of their phones.
The local NBC affiliate did not disclose the race of the mob, but it didn’t have to: The attack was videotaped and posted on YouTube.
On Staten Island in December, two police officers were hurt trying to control a mob of 50 black people attacking a single family home. Firefighters finally disbursed the crowd with fire hoses to get them away from the officers. Several pictures and videos show some of the action.
Last June, hundreds of black people rioted on Brighton Beach in an annual event called Brooklyn-Queens Day. Four people were shot and one killed. Much of it was posted on YouTube.
According to the New York Post: “The shootings didn’t surprise neighbors, who’ve gotten used to trouble on previous Brooklyn-Queens Days.”
“These kids come not to swim, they come for turf fights,” said Pat Singer, president of the Brighton Beach Neighborhood Association. “It’s a problem every year. It’s really hard on the businesses. All day long, all you see are hundreds of teenagers. Of course you’re going to have problems.”
In May of 2011, more than two dozen black people on a “rampage … terrorized” a Dunkin Donuts. The “swarm mob” attacked patrons, destroyed the fixtures and stole food, reported the Daily Mail, which published the story with pictures.
A few months before, the same scenario unfolded at a New York Wendy’s. A mob of black people were fighting and destroying property, and a teenage employee was attacked and hospitalized with a concussion.
Also like the episode before, the New York Fox affiliate removed the videos of the attack from its website – but not before Hip Hop New 24-7 posted it.
This is a long list. New York is a big city.
Last summer, a Bronx man said he was taunted for being white and beaten by a black mob on a subway. No charges were filed, and police refused to list it as a hate crime.
In June of last year, 11 black people were arrested for rioting, fighting and mayhem outside of a Long Island emergency room.
On Memorial Day 2011, hundreds of black people created a “riot” in Long Beach at Nassau County. The local Fox affiliate removed its video coverage from its website, but witnesses to the event posting on the Long Island Patch said lawless behavior from mobs of black people was a regular feature of life at that beach town.
“I was fortunate enough to witness both incidents,” said Kevin Spelman in Patch. “The one on Friday (senior cut day) and the one yesterday. I would classify the people I saw over the weekend leaving garbage and vandalism in their wake as ‘unsupervised, poorly raised teenagers’! The group involved in the riot was overwhelmingly black. But to your point, does that mean all black youth are troublemakers? I watched two white kids vandalizing one of the benches on the boardwalk.”
Less than a year before, five black men were arrested and two police officers were hurt after another riot at that beach town. The police had chased a suspect into a Long Beach house, where he refused to leave.
According to the Long Island Press: ”When the door was finally opened, the two other suspects attacked the officer, a large crowd gathered and a melee ensued. ‘Many members of the crowd began participating in the melee, cursing at, kicking and punching the police officers at the scene,’ police said.”
Near New York last summer, David Strucinski of Northern New Jersey came to the aid of his friend who was under attack by a group of 13 black people. He was “savagely” beaten and hospitalized with a coma and remained in critical condition. Nine black people were arrested, including the mother of one suspect who was trying to smuggle him out of the area in the trunk of her car.
Click the title headline for article
Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: Ok, first off let me just say that I'm not racist and that I know there are good black people out there. But on that note, I will say that the majority of blacks are uneducated criminals who destroy things. And attack people on a wide scale. Most of their horrible behaviour comes from upbringing. Their parents teach them to have smart mouths and to sound off in the face of authority. That's why you see so many blacks in jails. They run their mouths and get into worse trouble.
Most of today's young blacks have unrealistic dreams of being rap stars. Sag their pants down below their rear ends and look like total retards. It's ghetto garbage like this that cause the black community to stay at the bottom of the totem poll of life.
It's as if the black community are sub human brainless shells. Join us in prayer, that they will come to their senses. Thanks~
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)