VIDEO PROOF OF VOTER FRAUD IN D.C.

CLICK THE TITLE HEADLINE FOR ARTICLE

by CHUCK NORRIS

President Obama and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s Justice Department have a new obsession to obstruct any state’s passing of voter-identification laws, even recently attacking South Carolina and my own state of Texas. Holder calls voter ID laws “unnecessary” and says voter fraud “doesn’t exist,” but new video proof in his own voting precinct proves otherwise.

Obama’s administration says they’re against voter ID laws because they are valiantly trying to keep minorities and the poor from being unfairly discriminated against. But the truth is that they are trying to keep President Obama in office. They know that voter IDs are bad business for this White House’s campaign and re-election.

(Of course they are against voter I.D. laws, they would stop the illegal's from voting for them)

In the last couple weeks, video proof from Holder’s own voting precinct in Washington, D.C., revealed voter fraud is alive and well in the nation’s capital. On primary election day, April 3, a representative from James O’Keefe’s nonprofit organization Project Veritas simply strolled into the polling place and was offered the ballot for U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder after merely stating his name and address. Though not being asked for ID, O’Keefe’s assistant added that he forgot his ID, to which the poll worker retorted, “You don’t need it. It’s all right. As long as you’re in here, you’re on our list, and that’s who you say you are, you’re OK.”

O’Keefe’s assistant then replied, “I would feel more comfortable if I just had my ID. Is it all right if I go get it?” After the poll worker agreed, O’Keefe’s assistant said as he walked away, “I’ll be back faster than you can say furious,” playing on the scandalous Fast and Furious gun-smuggling debacle by Holder’s Department of Justice.

Of course, rather than confessing to culpability or that there might be a flaw in the election process, the District of Columbia Board of Elections announced last week that it was launching an investigation to possibly bring charges against Project Veritas.

As CitizenLink reported, the D.C. Board of Elections spokesperson Alysoun McLaughlin carefully spun her political rebuttal: “We’re very concerned about any kind of activity that occurs in a polling place where someone is misrepresenting themselves or otherwise obstructing what occurs at a polling place. Our concern is with the tactics that this individual is employing. If you walk into a polling place on Election Day to register to vote for the first time, then you need to provide proof that you are a resident of a district. But if you are a registered voter, if you’ve been on the rolls, we do not require ID of those individuals. That’s the law. We leave it to the policymakers to determine what those laws should be.”

There’s no shock or surprise that Holder and his DOJ cronies similarly pitched their response about the Project Veritas exposé by saying, “It’s no coincidence that these so-called examples of rampant voter fraud consistently turn out to be manufactured ones.”

But the truth is, as Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C. summarized, “They don’t want to do anything about the vulnerabilities in the system. That means they really don’t want elections that are secure and have integrity. It’s highly dangerous that the attorney general has that view toward safe and secure elections.”

Before the DOJ arraigns Project Veritas, they might want to recall that recently deceased infamous veteran news watchdog Mike Wallace often used undercover video on “60 Minutes” to expose fraud in Medicare claims and other consumer goods.

By the way, Project Veritas’ recent D.C. polling revelation is their fourth uncovering national voter fraud. Previous locations have included Minnesota, New Hampshire and Vermont, where O’Keefe obtained election ballots by using other celebrity names like Tom Brady, Tim Tebow and even some of the 1.8 million people who are deceased but still registered voters.

Texas better beware, because “Chuck Norris” might be next for Project Veritas.

Actually, in March, the U.S. Justice Department’s civil rights division filed legal action against Texas’ new photo ID requirement for voters, stating it restricts some Hispanic voters who lack governmental identification.

To assist Holder and Obama, NAACP president Benjamin Todd Jealous recently even petitioned the United Nation’s Human Rights Council, which of course has no jurisdiction over American law (though Jealous might not recognize that), that the tougher Texas voter ID law is unfair and discriminatory.

In 2003, the first voter ID laws were passed, and as of September 2011, 30 U.S. states require some form of ID in order for citizens to cast their vote. Since just January 2011, 13 states have passed more restrictive voter ID laws.

State polls have shown that as many as 75-80 percent of voters, including majorities of Hispanics and African-Americans, agree that voter ID laws are good and necessary. And let’s not forget the 2008 U.S. Supreme Court’s 6–3 decision, authored by Justice John Paul Stevens, that upheld Indiana’s strict ID requirement.

Voting is a right and privilege of citizens in this country and should be protected at all costs. As Joseph Farah, CEO of WND wrote this past week, “You and I are asked to present photo IDs many times throughout our lives. It’s hardly an intrusive demand to ensure against the growing problem of identity theft and other forms of fraud. It’s the least we should demand from a process so critical to the integrity of American politics.”

By opposing voter ID laws, however, the Obama administration is actually dismantling the integrity of elections by enabling voter fraud. As Farah again explained, “they are the kinds of changes that can transform America from the oldest constitutional republic in the world to a Third World-style banana republic. And that’s just what a second term of Barack Obama in the White House will mean.”

Having tried all we can to stop or taper the Obama administration’s anti-constitutional usurpations, we are left alone to take the path recommended by Founding Father James Madison, who admonish us patriots in 1788, “in a last resort a remedy must be obtained from the people, who can by the elections of more faithful representatives, annul the acts of the usurpers.”

CLICK ON THE TITLE HEADLINE FOR ARTICLE


Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: By now most Americans know Obama is a fraud and a disgrace to the oval office. I'd bet my last dollar that he was elected into office in 08 fraudulently. If you remember they had the wicked liberal group ACORN out there walking the streets illegally bagging votes from people who were not eligible to vote. Making up fake addresses for those who did not have one. That's the kind of tactics you can look forward to again this November. That's why it's absolutely crucial that conservative voters get out there and vote for the GOP! This November, take family and friends out to vote! people who never usually vote need to do so this year! Obama must be defeated or our nation is in real danger.

America, the great American melting pot?

This cartoon brings back memories. I loved all the school-house Rock songs. But it brings up a topic I'd like your input on. With so many illegal immigrants in the US today, and their voting relatives living here as well. Doesn't that cause a bad trend of change to our nation? Most people who are not white tend to vote for non-white people simply because of their nationality.

I think we saw the first example of this with the electing of Obama. And it turned out horrible for our nation. 2012 looks brighter, with Romney poised to defeat Obama. But there is nothing to stop this from happening again. Every year more and more illegal aliens flood into our country because the democrats refuse to take action on securing our borders.

So, what I'm saying is the more America fills up with minorities. The more America will stray from what our founding fathers wanted, and from the constitution. Because minority voters will always seek to elect minority people. It'll be interesting to see how the change directs our course over the years to come. Please don't get me wrong, I'm not a racist person by any means. This is just an observation.

South Jersey Man Gives Up His Obama Flag But Not His Opinions « CBS Philly

South Jersey Man Gives Up His Obama Flag But Not His Opinions « CBS Philly

Nobody expects this guy to give up his opinions. But Obama's face has no business being on an American flag. No presidents face should be on the flag for that matter. But especially Obama's because he can't even prove he's an American.

If you'd like to chime in on this and leave a comment, feel free...

Marines fight to protect crosses at Camp Pendleton as atheist groups seek removal

CLICK THE TITLE HEADLINE FOR ARTICLE

Planted atop a remote hill in the middle of California's Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base rest two 13-foot crosses.



Originally erected back in 2003 by seven marines grieving over lives lost in the war on terror, this site originally established for reflection has now become grounds for controversy.

“It's not a religious spot at all, it's a place for the Marines to grieve and to grow to let go of their burdens of what they had in their soul, so they can go back down that hill and back into battle and put their own lives on the line,” says marine widow Karen Mendoza.

Her husband Ray was one of those original seven who climbed the hill that day, three of whom have since been killed in action, including Ray.

“It's a symbol of sacrifice regardless of what you think, pray, like or don't like,” says Karen.

Over time the site has become a bit more permanent. A wildfire destroyed the original cross a few years back, so Marines and widows carried these two new versions up the hill.

Now two symbols are at the end of a brutal 3,000-foot hike that begins at an area of the base called Camp Horno and ends at the top of a ridge line that overlooks vast openness in one direction and the glistening Pacific Ocean in the other.

Here the crosses are blanketed in symbols of valor, sorrow and festivity. You'll see Purple Heart medals, pictures, books, messages, mementos from deployments around the globe and even a bottle or can of the fallen's favorite liquor...all left in remembrance.

While those symbols are at times heartbreaking, the rocks are what overcome your thoughts and have taken over the site. Each one has been carried and left here by a Marine, sailor, soldier, airman, widow or child.

Some are in excess of 50 pounds. Some are inscribed. Others look as they have just been freshly torn from the Pendleton ground. All are left as a symbol of the burden it takes to carry one of these rocks on such a brutal hike and the burden it takes to serve and ultimately give a life for your country.

As he overlooks the solemn site recently, retired Marine Colonel Nick Marano tells us, “This wasn’t intended to be a religious memorial, it was just intended to be able to provide a fitting and a dignified memorial to their fallen comrades and frankly controversy was the very last thing on their minds.”

Marano tells me no one would complain if, for example, someone decided to put up a Buddhist shrine, “No one would complain at all, and I bet if we poked around, we’d probably find something like that here…I mean you can see a very side variety of items have been used, everything from a bottle of Jack Daniels to a Purple Heart and everything in between. I think most Americans are very fair-minded and see this memorial, frankly, for what it is,” says the Colonel as he overlooks the site.

He continues, “These two memorials have been sitting out here largely unknown outside of a very small group of Marines and family here at Camp Pendleton. The view that you can even see them from is very restricted, certainly you can’t see it from the public freeway or any of the highly trafficked public roads and even aboard Camp Pendleton it’s a very narrow viewing angle that you have of these crosses and this site.”

But the area has become controversial and more known after a newspaper report last fall detailed the location and posted a picture. In response, several groups filed complaints with Marines arguing the site violated the Constitutional mandate of separation of church and state, including the Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers or MAAF. They want the crosses moved to a church on private land and flags or some other symbol used instead to mark the site.

(There is no constitutional mandate for separation of church and state)

"This Christian crosses need to go to a private Christian instillation and we need to stick to things that honor everyone equally and maintain neutrality towards government," says association president Jason Torpy.

For 10 years, the crosses have stood on the hill without complaint, but the MAAF says if they don't come down soon, it will file a lawsuit and possibly hold protests outside the Marine base gates. Torpey says the original Marines, while good intentioned, overstepped their bounds by building a shrine without approval or notice from the Corps.

"These Marines were abusing were abusing their access to the installation when they went on to it and starting building things," says Torpy.

Back in 2003, Pastor Scott Radestki climbed the hill as part of the original seven. He's frustrated the debate has come to this and says, "those individuals who have poured out their life, poured out their hope, left those rock stones in mementos at the top of the hill to honor their fallen comrades and to get rid of the burdens and the sadness and frustration so that they can free themselves and make clear decisions and continue to serve in our military focused."

He continues, "I think that is an excellent place to dump it...on top of that hill. And there's a freedom there, there's a hope there, and that's what makes me upset, is that somebody would try to take that away."

U.S. Marine Gunnar Vincens says he's divided on whether the crosses should be taken down. As an atheist in the Marines, he has no objections to a war memorial on the ridge above Camp Horno, “but it is religious in nature and commanders should not bring up marines who may not have the same Christian religious beliefs.”

MAAF and their supporters believe the crosses should be taken down because they're located on federal land and then replaced with something more appropriate in their view, like a flag, eagle, or globe and anchor. Colonel Marano says Marines and others who continue to come here to reflect will be sorry to see them go.

The Commandant of the Marines is expected to rule the cross controversy any day.

CLICK THE TITLE HEADLINE FOR THE ARTICLE

Lou Buren of TWAU BLOG: Many atheists today are waging war on anything Christian. I say many but not all. I know people who are atheists and have no problem with crosses being put up for marines. But there are certain types of atheists out there who not only deny God, but have waged war on anything that says his name or provokes thought of him. And it's really sad in my view.

And let me make it clear that there is no constitutional mandate for separation of church and state. The whole concept of separation of church/state came from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson. But was never an actual constitutional item. Keep in mind T. Jefferson was a Christian man. And his letter was never to try to keep church and state separate the way atheists try to twist it into meaning. It was to urge the government to not endorse one religion over another. It never said anything about the government not being involved with religion.

These marines put these crosses up to remember their fallen brothers. And we hope you'll pray that the crosses get to stay. We are also taking action by informing Liberty Counsel of this issue. If you have comments, feel free to leave them below...

Michigan teacher claims she was fired for organizing Trayvon Martin fundraiser

A middle school teacher says she lost her job at a Pontiac, Mich. charter school because she helped students organize a fundraiser for the family of slain Florida teenager Trayvon Martin.

The firing of Brooke Harris, an English and journalism teacher at Pontiac Academy for Excellence Middle School garnered national attention.

On Monday, the Mississippi-based advocacy group Southern Poverty Law Center demanded her reinstatement. The organization has also started a petition that has more than 8,000 signatures so far.

According the the Law Center's Teaching Tolerance blog:

Brooke's students identify with Trayvon Martin. Many of them are African American. Many have been stopped by police who thought they looked suspicious.
In fact, her students engaged so deeply with the issue that they asked to take it beyond essays and class discussions—they wanted to take action to help Trayvon's family.

The fundraiser was proposed for March 28. Students were to don hoodies, which was what Martin was wearing when he was killed. Once a month, the school allows students to pay $1 to wear street clothes instead of their uniform. According to local news reports, the students participating would each donate their $1 fee to the Martin family.

Harris said while the school's principal signed off on the fundraiser, Superintendent Jacqueline Cassell said no because of the manner in which they would be wearing the hoods - over their heads. Harris asked Cassell to meet with the students so they could present their case, but Harris was suspended for two days.

"I was told I was a bad teacher, that I was being unprofessional, that I'm being paid to teach, not to be an activist. When I tried to defend myself, it was construed as insubordination," Harris told the Detroit Free Press.

Harris then returned to school while suspended to drop off prizes for a literacy fair. Harris met with Cassell again and was given a two-week suspension.

"I asked her if she could please tell me what I did wrong to come to the first meeting," Harris said in a report by The Detroit News. "After I asked that question twice, she never gave me an answer — then she fired me."

Cassell said she is a "child of the civil rights movement" and has supported the work of the Southern Poverty Law Center in the past but said "this is not the time in the school year" for efforts that distract from academics, she told The Detroit News.

Cassell claims the protest was not the reason Harris was fired. Harris says she wants her job back, but is unsure if that is possible.

CLICK THE TITLE HEADLINE FOR ARTICLE

The school did the right thing in letting this teacher go. What the teacher was doing was being an activist. If teachers want to do this type of thing on their own time that's fine. But not on school time. It's unfortunate when anyone dies, but Trayvon most likely contributed to getting himself shot. And the whole hoody thing is ghetto and creepy.

Please join us, and contact the school and let them know you agree with them. Thank you.

Frank Gaffney to Discuss Radical Islam and Sharia Law at The Awakening 2012

Frank Gaffney, Founder and President of the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C., will address current and emerging threats to national security from radical Islam and Sharia Law at The Awakening 2012 in Orlando, Florida, on April 20-21. The threat of radical Islam is more widespread than most people think. To deal with the problem, you must first recognize that it exists. Mr. Gaffney is an expert on this issue. Mr. Gaffney served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear Forces and Arms Control Policy in the Reagan Administration. In April 1987, Mr. Gaffney was nominated to the position of U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy, and served in that position for seven months.

Join us on April 20-21, where people are united by love for our country’s freedom and our faith.

Register today at www.TheAwakening2012.org. Don’t wait! Reserve your tickets today to ensure your spot at this year’s most educational and exciting political event in Central Florida.

Unite with us as we educate, motivate, and activate you to make a difference. Register for this exciting event at www.TheAwakening2012.org or call 877-810-1776.

THIS IS A LIBERTY COUNSEL UPDATE
April 7, 2012

NEW SHERIFF CALLS FOR ROUNDUP OF OBAMA RECORDS

A presentation by WND’s Jerome Corsi to a standing-room-only crowd has convinced a New Jersey lawmaker and a local sheriff that the issue of President Obama’s eligibility for office “will have to be addressed.”

“The easiest way to put this to rest is to have the records unsealed,” Morris County Sheriff Ed Rochford told the Huffington Post in an email following the April 4 event in Morristown. “Mr. Corsi made a very convincing argument that President Obama may not be a natural born citizen of the United States.”

Likewise, New Jersey Assemblyman Anthony Bucco, R-Boonton, said Corsi’s speech leaves doubts about Obama’s citizenship status. He told the website it is not his place to determine whether Obama is a citizen, and he believes “a higher authority” must resolve the issue.

“I am not in a position to say what he put up on screen is demonstrative of evidence; that is for the court of law,” Bucco said. “This issue has not resolved itself. It won’t until some higher authority is involved.”

The evening was organized by several, including Billy Baer and Dan Haggerty, who cohost the radio program “Patriot’s Watch” in Philadelphia. Corsi told a crowd of 250 people: “The mainstream media has not given this fair treatment. But this is not going away. We really don’t know who our president is.”

Presenting research from “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” and utilizing a MacBook to show documents on a screen, Corsi used Abode Illustrator software to separate the layers of the document released by the White House and zoomed in on irregularities that show the document is a “bad forgery.” In his presentation, he provided evidence of inconsistencies between Hawaii health officials’ statements that there was no long-form birth certificate and Obama’s release of the purported certificate, and discrepancies concerning the name of the hospital where Obama was said to have been born. Corsi reported that Obama may be using a fraudulent Social Security number. He explained the evidence suggestion Selective Service documentation is not genuine, and he also discussed the topic of Obama’s school transcripts – which have yet to be released.

“There were many other talking points that I can say raised ‘a red flag,’” Sheriff Rochford said after the event.

According to the report, Bucco said he wouldn’t oppose a requirement that presidential candidates provide evidence of citizenship before getting on the New Jersey ballot.

“I think everyone should be able to provide something that shows citizenship,” Bucco added.

Meanwhile, Bucco warned that the eligibility issue will not simply disappear.

“He’s sitting in the Oval Office and he’s running again,” he said. “Based on the information that this gentleman put out, it’s not going away. This will have to be answered at some time. It will have to be addressed.”

The following is a video of Corsi’s presentation:


CLICK ON THE TITLE HEADLINE FOR THE ARTICLE